Opis

• Tytuł:
  Wittgenstein: From Ethics to Blind Rule-Following and Back Again
• Twórca:
  Nowak, Ewa
• Opis:
  The paper discusses Wittgenstein’s approaches to ethics within two contrastive contexts, e.g., pragmatism and cooperative-discursive normative practice. The first section revisits the fiasco of his early “negative” ethics. The second section subsequently shows how Wittgenstein’s mature concept of blind rule-following displaces normativity but simultaneously becomes the key predictor for discourse ethics (or, rather, a specific kind of it). The final section discusses the pros and cons of finitism in the light of contemporary philosophy of mind. As a conclusion, the author provides evidence for her hypothesis that there is no normative (embodied) mind without a manifest normative competence, which includes moral judgment and discursive competence.
• Dostępność obiektu:
  Dostęp otwarty
• Prawa:
  Prawa autorskie (c) 2018 Authors retain copyright and publishing rights to their articles in this journal, granting the journal the right to distribute them under the terms of the CC BY-SA 3.0 license.
• Data:
  2019.02.08
• Typ:
  info:eu-repo/semantics/article;
  info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
• Język:
  polski;
  pol
• Źródło:
  ETHICS IN PROGRESS; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2018); 131-161;
  Ethics in Progress; Tom 9 Nr 2 (2018); 131-161;
  2084-9257
• Format:
  application/pdf
• Wydawca:
  Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
• Relacja: http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/eip/article/view/17879/17634
• Temat i słowa kluczowe:
  Wittgenstein;
  ethics;
  pragmatism;
  blind rule-following;
  considered and deliberated judgment;
  Discourse Ethics;
  Habermas;
  Lind;
  Kohlberg;
  Tomasello;
  Gehlen;
  Bloor;
  Brożek
• Identyfikator: http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/eip/article/view/17879
• Dostawca danych:
  Platforma Otwartych Czasopism Naukowych UAM
• Czy mogę z tego obiektu skorzystać?:
  sprawdź warunki licencji
• Rodzaj zawartości:
  teksty