Object's details: The documenting duties of owners and property holders of historic buildings adapted for utility purposes and the practical application of article 25 point 1 of the Act on the Protection and Care of Historical Monuments

Provider:Platforma Otwartych Czasopism Naukowych UAM

Description

Title:
The documenting duties of owners and property holders of historic buildings adapted for utility purposes and the practical application of article 25 point 1 of the Act on the Protection and Care of Historical Monuments
Creator:
Lizak, Agata
Description:
Article 25 of the Act on the Protection and Care of Historical Monuments (hereinafter: u.o.z.o.z.) imposes some obligations on owners or property holders of listed immovable historic monuments that have been adapted for utility functions. These obligations include holding conservator’s documentation and having a programme of the preservation works and program of the development of the monument and its surroundings (both programmes shall receive the consent of the voivodeship historic preservation officer). This provision is the only one in the Act that strictly concerns the adaptation of historic monuments. Despite this fact, it is not fully applied in practice. The first reason for this is that there is no sanction if somebody does not hold the required documentation. Secondly, regulations are insufficiently precise, for example, the procedure for reaching an agreement with preservation officer is not specified. The article is based on empirical research carried out in selected voivodeship historic preservation offices. The text focuses on the problem of how article 25 of u.o.z.o.z. is applied in practice. It transpires that some voivodeship historic preservationofficers do not apply this provision at all, while in other voivodeships agreements are rare or are not reached as an autonomous activity but within the framework of other procedures (e.g. connected with allowances for performing some work). The analysis of documents prepared on the basis of article 25 u.o.z.o.z. leads to the conclusion that such documents are often incomplete or mistaken for other similar documents that are also obligatory, but on a different legal basis. What is more, the practice in the terms of the form and procedure of agreements is uneven – ordinarily, it takes the form of a letter, although there are also cases when a formal decision or opinion is issued. The results of empirical research served as a basis for de lege lata and de lege ferenda postulates.;
Article 25 of the Act on the Protection and Care of Historical Monuments (hereinafter: u.o.z.o.z.) imposes some obligations on owners or property holders of listed immovable historic monuments that have been adapted for utility functions. These obligations include holding conservator’s documentation and having a programme of the preservation works and program of the development of the monument and its surroundings (both programmes shall receive the consent of the voivodeship historic preservation officer). This provision is the only one in the Act that strictly concerns the adaptation of historic monuments. Despite this fact, it is not fully applied in practice. The first reason for this is that there is no sanction if somebody does not hold the required documentation. Secondly, regulations are insufficiently precise, for example, the procedure for reaching an agreement with preservation officer is not specified. The article is based on empirical research carried out in selected voivodeship historic preservation offices. The text focuses on the problem of how article 25 of u.o.z.o.z. is applied in practice. It transpires that some voivodeship historic preservation officers do not apply this provision at all, while in other voivodeships agreements are rare or are not reached as an autonomous activity but within the framework of other procedures (e.g. connected with allowances for performing some work). The analysis of documents prepared on the basis of article 25 u.o.z.o.z. leads to the conclusion that such documents are often incomplete or mistaken for other similar documents that are also obligatory, but on a different legal basis. What is more, the practice in the terms of the form and procedure of agreements is uneven – ordinarily, it takes the form of a letter, although there are also cases when a formal decision or opinion is issued. The results of empirical research served as a basis for de lege lata and de lege ferenda postulates.
Object availability:
free access
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
Date:
2023.03.15
Type:
info:eu-repo/semantics/article;
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion;
Artykuł naukowy
Language:
Polish;
pol
Source:
Studia Prawa Publicznego; No. 1 (41) (2023); 139-157;
Studia Prawa Publicznego; Nr 1 (41) (2023); 139-157;
2720-2445;
2300-3936
Format:
application/pdf
Publisher:
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
Relation: http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/spp/article/view/37723/32357
Subject:
historic building;
adaptation to useful functions;
voivodeship historic preservation officer;
agreement
Identifier: http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/spp/article/view/37723
Data provider:
Platforma Otwartych Czasopism Naukowych UAM

Similar objects

The documenting duties of owners and property holders of historic buildings adapted for utility purposes and the practical application of article 25 point 1 of the Act on the Protection and Care of Historical Monuments

Creator:Lizak, Agata

Date:2023.03.15

Type:other

Analysis of the Impact of Moisture and Biodeterioration on the Assessment of the Technical Condition of Historical Buildings

Creator:Ksit, Barbara

Date:2023

Type:image

Applying active thermography in the non-destructive investigation of historical objects = Zastosowanie termowizji aktywnej do badań nieniszczących obiektów zabytkowych

Creator:Nowak, Henryk | Noszczyk, Paweł

Date:2015

Type:image

Wybór metody wzmocnienia słupów murowanych w obiektach zabytkowych z wykorzystaniem syntetycznego wskaźnika oceny

Creator:Kafel Katarzyna | Leśniak Agnieszka

Date:2018

Type:other

Renovation and adaptation of the historic Olsztyn Purification House Bet Tahara into a public utility building = Renowacja i adaptacja zabytkowego olsztyńskiego Domu Oczyszczeń Bet Tahara na budynek użyteczności publicznej

Creator:Deja, Barbara Maria

Date:2015

Type:image

Repair and Renovation of the Historic Church in Ruda Śląska after Many Failures Caused by Mining Exploitation

Creator:Drobiec, Łukasz

Date:2021

Type:image

Ekonomiczno-społeczne efekty projektów translokacji obiektów zabytkowych na poziomie lokalnym

Creator:Kołakowski, Tomasz

Date:2016.12.31 | 2016

Type:image

Application of steel bar bracings in renovation and modernization of historic buildings = Zastosowanie stalowych stężeń prętowych w renowacji i modernizacji obiektów zabytkowych

Creator:Kuchta, Krzysztof

Date:2015

Type:image

Federacja Bibliotek Cyfrowych

Object's details: The documenting duties of owners and property holders of historic buildings adapted for utility purposes and the practical application of article 25 point 1 of the Act on the Protection and Care of Historical Monuments

Description

Similar objects